Introduction
This
paper covers archaeology in the historic counties of Brecknocks, Flint,
Denbigh, Montgomery and Radnor for the period after 1600 and follows from the Stage
1 Resource Audit carried out by the Clwyd-Powys Archaeological Trust. It is felt that the combining of Post
Medieval and Industrial is inappropriate, in terms of the wide range of monument
types included (e.g. churches to nuclear power stations), the sheer volume (and
potential volume) of sites to be covered and the different nature of the study
of industrial archaeology (especially when a site is still functioning) and
'conventional' archaeology of the post-medieval period. For the purposes of this assessment however
the specified structure given has been retained.
I
should like to acknowledge the contributions made by Judith Alfrey, Dr Stephen
Briggs, Phil Copleston, Stephen Hughes, David Percival, Bob Silvester, Richard
Suggett, Mark Walters and Elisabeth Whittle.
Summary
Existing knowledge: strengths
·
Remains
from the post-medieval and industrial periods still largely exist on the
ground.
·
There
are around 22,000 and 18,000 database entries in the SMR and NMRW respectively,
for the area and period.
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
Compared
to earlier periods, the number of records against survival of sites is
considerably lower.
·
SMR,
NMRW and Cadw data have inbuilt inconsistencies and biases and there is a
simple lack of baseline data on many subjects.
·
The
depth of information represented by the SMR/NMRW database entries is not known.
Research opportunities
·
One
of the immediate priorities should be to address differences in data and to
pool what is already known.
·
Many
more basic records need to be created to reflect the number and survival of
sites, BUT we need to assess the depth of the present record.
·
Compared
to other periods, much better written and graphic records are available for the
post-medieval & industrial, e.g. OS maps, and there is justification for an
organised programme of 'site extraction' from such sources.
·
The
physical resource is disappearing rapidly, by demolition and 'conservation';
there is a need to record and research quickly what is left and use the results
to inform higher standards of conservation.
1.
Settlement, housing and storage
Existing knowledge: strengths
· There is a wealth of readily available information contained in OS maps, especially the early 25in series, which provide useful evidence on the development of settlement patterns and the evolution of holdings.
·
There are partial studies of individual site types
relating to settlement, notably: farm buildings (RCAHMW Radnor farmsteads); industrial
housing in Newtown; studies of lower status settlements in the uplands (Uplands
Initiative) and higher status settlements in the lowlands (Register of Historic
Parks & Gardens and the RCAHMW gardens database); vernacular building
studies such as Houses of the Welsh Countryside and Buildings of
Wales for Clwyd and Powys.
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
Insufficient
study of settlements in their wider contexts – although there is much listed
building data in the SMR (probably more than in the other SMRs) it is available
only as site or point data devoid of context.
·
Absence
of detailed surveys of some site types, e.g. parks and gardens
·
The
more recent the housing, the less we know about it, resulting in virtually no
knowledge/records of 20th century housing (except from specialised collections
in NMRW, such as PSA and North collections).
Research opportunities
·
There
are numerous research opportunities in this wide-ranging theme. For example,
Tir Gofal could be developed into a wider, continuing scheme whereby a closer
interest is taken in monitoring all grants for land or building improvement by
all the bodies concerned acting co-operatively. This could have the aims of collecting and maintaining a more
comprehensive record of both archaeological and environmental data to provide
more informed advice on the preservation value of the resource and would
include support for joint research projects necessary during the process.
Existing knowledge: strengths
·
Land
characterisation projects.
· RCAHMW surveys of the Montgomeryshire Canal and Brecon Forest Tramroads.
·
Pontcysyllte
aqueduct and associated canal are included on the tentative World Heritage Site
list, reflecting the research into and importance of the sites.
·
RCAHMW/Ironbridge
detailed study of Leighton Estate and model farms.
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
There
is lack of joined-up' data gathering and interpretation, partly constrained by
the shortcomings of text-based databases and partly by the need to gather data
in manageable areas, themes or projects.
Research opportunities:
·
There
are many opportunities for field observation and for work on existing documents
and records, either as projects in their own right or as components of related
projects.
3.
The use and exploitation of natural resources
Existing knowledge: strengths
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
· Rural industries, particularly the small village industries and those on dispersed farmsteads or estates (e.g. tanning, smithing, woollen manufacture, agriculture, brewing, malting, brick making, clothing, boot making, &c.). Thematic surveys on any of these topics, but particularly the agricultural and woollen industries, are urgently needed to provide baseline data.
·
Public
utilities: water, gas and electricity installations – all very vulnerable.
Research opportunities
· There is keen public interest in a narrow range of building and installation, particularly railways and defence sites. However, until recently, such enthusiasm had not been well converted into effective recording, conservation or preservation policies: local and national government do not usually see remains of industrial activity as 'archaeology'. There is a clear need to raise the profile of all industrial archaeology with the public and authorities on the one hand, and for the heritage bodies to engage more closely with the numerous specialist societies on the other.
·
There
is a need to quantify the amount of grey literature and archive material
waiting to be accessed to the record and to encourage its early inclusion so
that we have a more accurate picture of the breadth and depth of the
information available.
·
Industrial
plant continues to be altered, developed or demolished; from experience in
south Wales and applicable perhaps only in the field of industrial archaeology
is the need to carry out detailed process recording at those sites which are
representative of their industry, despite the existence of apparently reliable documentation.
4.
Coastal archaeology (excluding maritime – discussed elsewhere)
Existing knowledge: strengths
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
Current
site knowledge seems satisfactory, although general comments about the need for
context could apply.
5.
Environmental archaeology
Existing knowledge: strengths
·
RCAHMW's dendro-chronology programme.
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
Many;
see 'Research opportunities' below
Research opportunities
6.
Religious or non-secular archaeology
Existing knowledge: strengths
·
RCAHMW
chapels recording project (pan-Wales study of chapels and chapel architecture)
which has created over1600 basic records and includes many enhanced records.
Existing knowledge: weaknesses
·
No
organised study of post medieval churches, especially Victorian.
·
No
organised study of graveyards.
Research opportunities:
·
Investigate
plans holdings of Church Commissioners & Diocesan archives.
·
Enhance
existing and expand database of all churches, especially Victorian sites –
which largely still exist.
Brian
Malaws
Royal
Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales
Plas Crug
Aberystwyth
Ceredigion SY23 1NJ
October
2002